Is the Gentleman’s Scale still relevant?

Or is 72nd scale in decline?  I have listened to some opinions about this in recent podcasts.  One of the hosts from the Scale Model Podcast explained that he does not build 72nd because he has trouble seeing the parts.  Yet one of the hosts from Plastic Model Mojo boldly claims 72nd to be God’s True Scale.

God’s Scale, Gentlemen’s scale, braille scale or whatever it may be called, I think many of us got our start in 1/72 scale.  Particularly those of us who started with aircraft.  I certainly did.  I can recall making a pile of 72nd planes back as a young one.  They were cheap and widely available.  They were also easy to get assembled, painted and pretty much destroyed in an afternoon. It seems to me that at one time, 72nd was THE scale for aircraft.  There was a ton of different subjects from every manufacturer on a consistent basis. 

A little 72nd Scale history

The origins of 72nd scale for models can be traced back to the early 1930’s with the first scale models of aircraft by Skybird kits.  This English company wanted a uniform scale for all of their kits picked 72nd scale because a six foot tall person would be one inch tall.  To me this seems like an arbitrary reason to choose a scale.  Anyway, these kits were mainly of the “block of wood you get to carve into an airplane!” variety.

The first plastic kits came out in by the mid-1930s by another English company known as ‘Frog Penguin’.  Frog stands for “Flies Right Off the Ground”, which referred to their line of flying models.  Adding the “Penguin” indicated these models would never fly.  Rather cheeky I’d say.

During WW2, 72nd scale bakelite plastic scale models were made by several manufacturers to aid soldiers and aircrew recognize different aircraft types.  After the war we had Frog, Airfix, Hasegawa, Hawk, Aurora, Revell and Monogram all producing 72nd scale aircraft kits in the plastic we are familiar with today.  But these new companies started producing in other scales with a lot of success including 1/48 and 1/32.

While it may not be as popular around here, there is still a big market for it in Europe and Asia.  Up until recently I would have believed the majority of aircraft releases were in 72nd scale.  I have no data to support it, but I am not sure that is true anymore.

My own 72nd Scale Experience

Below is a collage of the 72nd scale aircraft that I can remember building back in the day.  I’ll be charitable and say these kits were basic.  They certainly did not engender a love for the scale.  They were generally poorly detailed and had fit issues.  Actually, a few of these were real exercises in frustration but they were readily available and I could afford them as a pre-teen.  Fair warning, you are about to see some horrific kits:

Actually this one fit together remarkably well.  One of those rare gems.

If anything, these kits pushed me towards 48th scale back in the day.  Sure it was generally a jump in price but the detail it offered was more than worth it.  I left the hobby for over 10 years but when I returned I had no interest in 72nd – mainly because of my previous frustration with it.  Also because the 48th kits designed and produced in the early 2000s were unbelievably detailed and they actually FIT TOGETHER! Whoa, what a crazy concept.

Maybe that is what this is about.  Maybe the so-so and crappy kits of the 70s and 80s that we cut our teeth on have had a permanent effect on our attitude towards the scale?  If that is the case, it is a little unfair.  I have dabbled occasionally in 72nd and I was pleasantly surprised by the detail on Tamiya’s 1/72 F4U-1d Corsair and that is hardly a cutting edge kit.


I also had a great time detailing and painting Hasegawa’s ancient Nick.  It came pretty bare of detail but with some fun scratch building and some aftermarket it built up nicely and I was lucky enough to not flub the paint when I was finishing it.  

As for models produced in the last 10 years, I bought Zvesda’s Hind and Academy’s F-4J in 72nd and wow, these kits are night and day different than 72nd models of the past.  I can’t yet report on fit but their detail and engineering are right up there with recent 48th scale releases.

Is 72nd still relevant?

I’d say that it might not be my first pick of scales to build but when a 72nd model is built well and finished well, it is something to behold… if people actually notice it.  I say that because I think 72nd scale is at a disadvantage at contests.  These models are small and, in general, do not command attention. I used to see a decent number of 72nd builds on display at the contests I regularly attend.  This number seems like it is shrinking.  I’ll concede this might be a recent phenomenon or it might be a regional thing.

But it could also be a general decline in interest.  I think it is very hard for a 72nd scale single engine prop plane to win a ‘best in show’ at a contest.  Hell, I think it is hard for that model to get any attention within its own category except from those builders who know how challenging it is to turn out a winner from some of these kits.

But that is from the contest perspective and not necessarily from the building and enjoyment perspective.  From that side there is definitely a place for 72nd scale and it makes sense.  Homes are getting smaller and people tend to downsize as they age.  If you want to display your prized builds, the space these models take up becomes a real consideration.

I also believe there is something ‘right’ about the physical presence of the model.  Roughly speaking, the actual size of a finished model of a modern 1/72 Jet fighter is similar to a 1/48 Prop fighter and a 1/35 Tank kit.   I think this “finished model size” is directly linked to the reason these have historically been popular scales and subjects.

Final Thoughts

I believe the relevance of 72nd scale depends entirely on who you ask.  Model Buddy Ian believes the kits are too small and finicky to build for most of us ‘older guys’.  But as a fan of models, he also believes it is the small scale of the subjects that makes them very attractive and ‘model like’.  I can’t argue with that.

For the foreseeable future, there will be a 72nd scale legacy.  As in: if you want to build a given aircraft, it will most likely be available in 72nd scale.  I know this is true due to the number of kit entries over at Scalemates and because I always see vendors with piles of these 72nd scale kits at model contests.

I also see these vendors pack them all up at the end of the show with few sales, if any.  It may be because their kits are a tired old lot and builders just want the latest and greatest.  But maybe not.  Either way, I’d love to hear your thoughts about this.

22 thoughts on “Is the Gentleman’s Scale still relevant?

Add yours

  1. Interesting. I have gone the same path. I have built just a few 1/72 scale model kits because they were not readily available in 1/48 like the Vickers Wellington which I have been building.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I remember back in the day building Monogram 1/48 kits because they were available, then switching to 1/72 because there was more choices as to subjects.
    Now I’ll build either scale depending on subject(size). The biggest problem is were to put/store all these finished project. I agree that we’re down sizing our homes and our aged eye site isn’t what it used to be for smaller scale(1/72).
    Wondering what the average age is now for a builder in this hobby and does that have an effect on scale preference?
    Oh well…I’ll putter along with my poor eye site and less dexterity in my digits(makes me sound old)building what I fancy at the time whether it be 1/72 or 1/48. Still enjoying the hobby at age 62 as I did when I was 12.
    Stay Safe…Paul

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I build almost exclusively 1:72 First Worod War aircraft, with one or two WWII thrown in once in a while. The display space is key, as is the number of kits available in that scale. I have over 140 different WWI types in the stash, there are nowhere near that many in any other scale. Also I don’t want a model that falls together and “fits well”. I’m a modeller, I want to add to my skills by building it, and adding the detail I feel it needs.

    Liked by 2 people

  4. I enjoyed the historical information about 72nd scale. Back in my early days of modeling (early 1960s), scale really didn’t matter to me. A lot of kits were box scale, and weren’t really compatible with other ones. I have divested myself of 1/32 scale kits mainly because of display space constraints. My preferred scale is 1/48, but I still have some 1/72 scale kits of aircraft from my old carrier air wing. Building all of them in 48th scale would take up too much room. Another advantage of 72nd scale is that there seems to be a better selection of aircraft in that scale.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. I suspect this may be a regional thing — I’ve heard smaller scales are more popular in countries like Japan and Europe where they have smaller houses.

    Personally, I’d like to see more 1/144 scale releases, though I know it’s a limited market. I did a 1/144 scale pink P-40 recently, and a friend did a Republican I-16 from Zvezda. However, it seems like there’s not much out there at the local hobby shop beyond Revell kits that go back to the ’70s, and most of the stuff on scalemates seems like it is out of Japan. As someone who cut my teeth on 28mm miniatures, some good quality 1/144 kits would make for some nice quick builds that can scratch an itch.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Back in the day I did some 1/144 teen fighters from Hobby Craft. While the cockpits and gear bays were basic at best, some of these kits had an amazing amount of detail for the time and size. Dragon used to have a pile of these as well – though much better quality. I’ve seen a few of these where the builder simply painted the inside of the canopy black (or just painted the ‘cockpit’ all black and it was effective.


  6. I’ve made models in 1/32 and 1/48 in the past but not for a couple of decades. I make only 1/144 and 1/72 these days because I am more interested in making a large variety of models than dedicating endless hours detailing bigger models, which seems counter to the current trends of super detailing and complex weathering. I do about half my modelling in 1/144 these days because it is the only realistic scale for large aircraft like airliners and big bombers. The great advantage of 1/72 is the immense range of kits available which means it is these days possible to model any aeroplane you’ve ever heard of. As for competition winners, who cares?

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Good points. Its funny you mention those current trends. I love superdetailing and painting. But once the paint and decals are on, I am ready to move onto the next thing. I really have to make an effort to want to weather can carry it through. I did one recently and I really wanted to dedicate myself to learning the weathering trade. But I just lost interest in the project and boxed it up.


  7. I think 1/72 is still relevant, though I know what you mean about the poor fit on old kits. All the Tamiya and Hasegawa models I’ve built have been great though. It feels like most of the aircraft models in my local model shops in both Okinawa and Sasebo were also 1/72 scale, or they had a 1:1 amount of shelf space dedicated to each size. I think 1/72 is probably popular over here because houses and apartments tend to be smaller and 1/72 takes up less shelf space. I have a 1/48 A5M2b Claude thats on my to-do list when I feel good about my skills again, but I’ll need a create a space to put it.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Glad you listen to the podcast. I hope you enjoy it. For me, modern 72nd scale kits are some of the best value for the money modelling out there. I still maintain that the Tamiya 72nd scale Zeros are the best engineered model kits I’ve ever built. I like the constant scale and the fact that you see aircraft in 72nd scale that you’d never see in the larger scales. I enjoy it and the size gives me space for more models.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. As someone who has rapidly filling display cases, I am acutely aware of this space issue! I’ve seen the Tamiya Zero up close and I agree, it is very nice. I really enjoy the podcast – you two are doing an excellent job.

      Liked by 1 person

  9. I think it depends where you live, and what parts of the internet you inhabit. Certainly from a European perspective, 1/72 is thriving with newly tool kits being released all the time. True, the market for 1/48 and 1/32 appears to be growing (which is great) – but 1/72 is still the mainstay and looks to be for the foreseeable future.

    Liked by 2 people

  10. Late to this post, I like 1/72 scale for planes, they just look right, offer just enough detail for me that I don’t feel like I can’t achieve my goal, and the space/cost per model is a definite bonus. For ground vehicles I’ve dabbled in 1/48 scale, but will probably go to 1/35 as options are better. For figures, I definitely like 1/35 if I’m going to detail, 1/48 and 1/72 get the basic table-top-wargaming painting.


  11. Very interesting article. Personally, I went the other way around. I’ve started modelling 1/48th scale aircraft but recently have moved to 1/72nd and I absolutely love it! To me, it is really the best scale, small enough to easily handle and display them, without occupying too much space but big enough to add lots of detail. My only complaint is precisely the fact that the market has moved more towards bigger scales and the offer of good kits in 1/72nd is not as much as in 1/48th. Kudos to Tamiya, Eduard, Arma Hobby and other easter European companies that have produced some of the best kit and aftermarket in 1/72nd.

    Liked by 1 person

  12. Very interesting post. I found it because I was looking for the origin of the term “Gentlemens scale.“ I started with 1/48 scale kits in the 60s and early 70s, then took many years away from modeling to return when I was in graduate school in the 1980s. I started only to build 1/72 scale kits because I did not have room to display many of them. I like all of my models in the same scale, so that is been my experience.

    My skills are not good enough to enter a contest but they are good enough for my purposes. Maybe that accounts for the decline in popularity? There are many exquisitely talented modelers out there and they can show off their chops better with a larger subject. Try building 1/700 scale ships!

    As my eyes get worse I still find I can build tiny kits. That comes from years of miniature painting for wargaming. I also still have limited space but I also feel that manipulating any type of model helps you use motor skills and do other things that help your mind as you get older.

    If my eyes get worse, I’ll build something big again. I am hankering to build a 1/32 scale aircraft again after so many years away from them.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: